Sunday, August 30, 2099

Welcome to Language Cake!

Language Color Code: English, Spanish, Chilean, Turkish, Indonesian

I am a Spanish major, English teacher, and self-described language nerd* who loves all things linguistic. Since no one around me seems quite as interested in language idiosyncrasies as yours truly, I created this blog as a space to share fun facts and things that I find interesting about language in general as well as specific languages.

I will also be asking language questions, so hopefully you fellow language nerds who are reading this blog for the pure joy and fun of language facts will also be able to help me answer them!

Thanks for stopping by - enjoy!

*nerdpastel in Chilean slang = cake in literal English -- see what I did there?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DISCLAIMER:  There is a difference between language expert and language lover -- I am the latter but certainly do not claim to be the former.  Therefore, please forgive (and correct!) the (probably not-so-) occasional grammar or spelling error, not only in my prose but also regarding inaccurate or incomplete explanations of language points.

If you do find a mistake or inconsistency, or just something that inspires you to comment, please do!  I love comments!  PLEASE, show me what I am missing, tell me that I am brilliant, or start a discussion about language in the comments!  It will make my day.  :)

Friday, May 11, 2012

Cool Stuff: Each

I would just like to take a moment to sing the praises of the word each.  It is the only word that comes to my mind which encompasses the totality of a word like all yet maintains the individuality of those entities included in the "all."  The word every comes close to this, but it does not quite reach the level of separateness inherent within the whole that each so beautifully does.  While every hints that there is more to the all that unmitigated oneness, it still favors that oneness in its connotation; each maintains the oneness, but emphasizes the distinctness within.

So here's to you, each!

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Language Puns (Spanish): Aladdin

Things That Don't Make Sense In English: Could

This will be my first post in an ongoing "Things That Don't Make Sense" series that will address things that don't make sense in English, Spanish, Turkish, and any other language I stumble upon.

Right now I'd like to take a minute to address the word could.  I can't count the number of complaints I've gotten from students about this word.  Aside from the ridiculous pronunciation relative to its spelling (we really should be saying "kowld" or writing it kood or even kud), it just has too many meanings.

Can in an of itself is a strange word for people whose native language has regular conjugation, like Spanish.  For example: the verb poder, Spanish's version of can (or literally to be able):

puedo - I can
puedes - you can
puede - he/she/it can
podemos - we can
pueden - they can


Although poder is not quite as easy-peasy in its conjugation as other verbs due to stem changes, there is still a different conjugation for each subject that follows a regular pattern.  This may seem more complicated than English conjugation (or lack thereof) to native English speakers, since we tend to use one version of a verb for I, you, we, and they and only bother to add an -s or -es for he, she, and it:

I walk
you walk
he/she/it walks
we walk
they walk


But you may have noticed that English can't even be bothered with any conjugation when it comes to modal verbs, like can above -- it's the same for every subject!  Talk about lazy.


Things brings me to my next point, which also happens to be the future subject of a "Things That Don't Make Sense" post: the English past tense.  There is no conjugation whatsoever in this tense, which, again, may seem simple; and it might even have been simple if it weren't for all of the irregulars (hence the future post).  One of these irregulars is the very same can, which by the English "rule" should be canned in the past tense.  But nope!  That's too easy.  Although it is the same for every subject, the past tense of can is the nonsensical could.

As if its horrendous pronunciation and confusingly irregular conjugation weren't enough, could also functions as the CONDITIONAL version of can.  The sentence "I could just read for hours" may be referring to the real past or a hypothetical future, depending on the context: "When I was younger, I could just read for hours, but now that I'm older, my eyes get tired more quickly" versus "What shall I do with my day off?  I could go to the zoo, or I could just read for hours."  Is your could helping you to relate an anecdote or make a decision?  Context only knows...

For Spanish-speakers, this is even (slightly) more complicated, since there are two simple past tenses (preterite and imperfect).  Could is the translation for all subject forms of pudo, podía, and podría.  For Spanish-speaking students of English who have to constantly train their brains, eyes, ears, and tongues to acclamate to our more-exceptions-than-patterns-to-memorize language, it is particularly frustrating to have to remember that all three versions of a word actually only have one translation.

Of course the multifaceted nature of could could (see what I did there) also lend it to be the subject of fascination, awe, and appreciation.  While I do concede that it is a useful word (and I actually have a particular fondness for modal verbs), as my pondering this word has come of multiple complaints from non-native students and friends of mine about their frustrations with it, I stand in solidarity and dedicate this post to them!

What are your views on the word could and other irregular verbs and/or modals?